Welcome! This free speech community journal was created so the Maple Heights African American community could share videos, photos, events, articles, posts, ideas, thoughts, and information.  We're now exclusively on Facebook, so don't forget to also check out our Facebook page.  Have a fantastic day!



Showing posts with label INTIMIDATION. Show all posts
Showing posts with label INTIMIDATION. Show all posts

Thursday, July 24, 2014

DOES MAPLE HEIGHTS CITY COUNCIL NEED ITS OWN ATTORNEY?

What happens when members of a city council feel harassed or threatened by another public official? Who can they go to? 


What if there's a pattern of abuse or intimidation, who do they turn to?


These are questions a city council may want to ask, because it seems it's not quite clear who represents who down at Maple Heights City Hall.


There are federal authorities that do handle what's called "deprivation of rights under color of law" abuses.


As stated regarding "Color of Law Abuses":

"U.S. law enforcement officers and other officials like judges, prosecutors, and security guards have been given tremendous power by local, state, and federal government agencies—authority they must have to enforce the law and ensure justice in our country. These powers include the authority to detain and arrest suspects, to search and seize property, to bring criminal charges, to make rulings in court, and to use deadly force in certain situations.
 

Preventing abuse of this authority, however, is equally necessary to the health of our nation’s democracy. That’s why it’s a federal crime for anyone acting under “color of law” willfully to deprive or conspire to deprive a person of a right protected by the Constitution or U.S. law. “Color of law” simply means that the person is using authority given to him or her by a local, state, or federal government agency.
 

The FBI is the lead federal agency for investigating color of law abuses, which include acts carried out by government officials operating both within and beyond the limits of their lawful authority. Off-duty conduct may be covered if the perpetrator asserted his or her official status in some way.
 

During 2012, 42 percent of the FBI’s total civil rights caseload involved color of law issues—there were 380 color of law cases opened during the year. Most of the cases involved crimes that fell into into five broad areas:

continued HERE


There are also court rulings regarding suits against public employers for retaliation, COERCION OF A PUBLIC SERVANT OR VOTER, etc etc etc


And there are freedom of speech issues.


So again we ask, does a city council need its own special attorney chosen by them; and do individuals on a city council need their own attorney?

Related:

Intimidation (wiki)

Intimidation

City Council moves to hire its own lawyer November 4, 2013

Council Calls For Independent Attorney November 15, 2006
 

Saturday, June 21, 2014

ARE MAPLE HEIGHTS POLICE ENGAGED IN PUBLIC INTIMIDATION?

Several residents (who attended) stated  that at the last Maple Hts city council meeting, the police were videotaping the meeting.

 
 
What does this mean if true? Well, police videotapes, we would think, constitute public record and are kept in police departments for various people  to access (especially the police).  Would you feel comfortable talking about police abuse/misconduct/racism/cutting police  salary/benefits at a council meeting knowing the police had your name, face, address, your statements, etc. forever stored? 


We don't have a problem with members of council videotaping for educational purposes, or council for public record; or even the general public videotaping a council meeting.  There does appear to be a big problem when it is done by the police.
 

 
African Americans should be engaged in any discussion of the videotaping of any public meetings (in their community) by the police, and if found unconstitutional/violation of their civil rights/civil liberties  then the videotaping by them (law enforcement)   should be challenged, stopped and if necessary legal remedies sought. 

 
 
As stated in another post, any predominantly African American community (city) where the legal/judicial system (which includes l aw director, council, safety director, law enforcement)  is predominantly white, probably (but not always) means institutional racism is entrenched in your community (city). 

 
 
The law enforcement community   has already been faced with outrage over privacy rights violations, racial profiling, stop and frisk,  murder, excessive force, and now they could possibly face a charge of public or racial intimidation by videotaping at public meetings (?)

 
 
African American communities have allowed institutional racism to continue in their communities sometimes for fear of retribution and/or intimidation by law enforcement and the legal/judicial system.  Well, it seems Maple Heights police may have driven that point home.

Thursday, May 22, 2014

HAS "OPEN GOVERNMENT" SHUT DOWN IN MAPLE HEIGHTS?

IS MAPLE HEIGHTS (OHIO) GOVERNMENT (WHICH IS IN/UNDER FISCAL WATCH) OUT OF CONTROL? ANONYMOUS SOURCES REPORT THAT COUNCIL PRESIDENT, JACKIE ALBERS HAD A COUNCILMAN REMOVED BY THE POLICE BECAUSE HE ASKED QUESTIONS (?)  Call and ask


WHAT IF HE HAD REFUSED TO LEAVE?  WHAT RULES WERE IN PLACE THAT GAVE Council President JACKIE ALBERS THE RIGHT TO DO WHAT SHE DID? SHOULD SHE BE REMOVED AS COUNCIL PRESIDENT?


WHAT IS THE PROBLEM? DO SOME OF THESE POLITICIANS HAVE A PROBLEM WITH ANSWERING CERTAIN QUESTIONS OR BEING CRITIQUED OR HAVING "SUNLIGHT" ON WHAT GOES ON IN MAPLE HEIGHTS GOVERNMENT?



COUNCILMAN BROWNLEE DID NOT CAUSE THIS GOVERNMENT TO BE IN FISCAL WATCH.  WHY ARE THEY TRYING TO SHUT HIM UP!!

[A BLOW TO GOVERNMENT TRANSPARENCY]: COUNCILMAN BROWNLEE'S VIDEO CAMERA (HE WAS TAPING THE COUNCIL MEETING AS HE HAS DONE FOR THE LAST 4 MONTHS) WAS PHYSICALLY REMOVED BY THE LAW DIRECTOR. 

 
HAS "OPEN GOVERNMENT" SHUT DOWN IN MAPLE HEIGHTS? 


THERE NEEDS TO BE A FULL INVESTIGATION, AND MAPLE HEIGHTS RESIDENTS NEED TO SPEAK UP AND DEMAND ANSWERS ABOUT WHAT HAPPENED AND IS HAPPENING IN THEIR GOVERNMENT!!



SHOULD THIS BE A MATTER FOR THE OHIO SUPREME COURT TO ADDRESS?   IF A PATTERN OF INTIMIDATION (BY LEADERS IN THIS GOVERNMENT) CAN BE ESTABLISHED THEN IT NEEDS TO STOP!!!

PLEASE WATCH AT LEAST THE LAST 5-6 MINUTES OF THIS TAPE.

Monday, September 30, 2013

ON THE RIGHTS OF CITIZENS



 Thought for the day:


[Freedom of Speech] Opinions, conjecture, complaints, observations, / legal redress, voting are rights that citizens have.



Surveillance, invasions of privacy, intimidation, excessive force, misconduct, and acts of retaliation by public officials/public employees because a citizen exercises their rights is called abuse of power/position and there should and must be legal consequences for the person/persons who abuse their power/position. (See also "Color of Law")



Related:
Color of Law Abuses 

DOJ - Color of Law 


Filing Complaints for Color of Law Abuses:

To file a color of law complaint, contact your local FBI office by telephone, in writing, or in person. The following information should be provided:

  • All identifying information for the victim(s);
  • As much identifying information as possible for the subject(s), including position, rank, and agency employed;
  • Date and time of incident;
  • Location of incident;
  • Names, addresses, and telephone numbers of any witness(es);
  • A complete chronology of events; and
  • Any report numbers and charges with respect to the incident.

You may also contact the United States Attorney’s Office in your district or send a written complaint to:

Assistant Attorney General
Civil Rights Division
Criminal Section
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, Northwest
Washington, DC 20530