Welcome! This free speech community journal was created so the Maple Heights African American community could share videos, photos, events, articles, posts, ideas, thoughts, and information.  We're now exclusively on Facebook, so don't forget to also check out our Facebook page.  Have a fantastic day!



Showing posts with label MAPLE HEIGHTS POLICE DEPARTMENT. Show all posts
Showing posts with label MAPLE HEIGHTS POLICE DEPARTMENT. Show all posts

Monday, October 27, 2014

A GAME OF POLITICS IN MAPLE HEIGHTS

More glossy postcards and what appears to be early (2015 election) campaign literature.  Aren't you sick of it?


If you want things to change in your city, one of the things you have to change is City Hall because those elected and appointed have enormous power.  Local laws, policies, procedures, leadership which impacts almost every area of your normal day to day life often originates in City Hall.  


The recent literature we saw from City Hall was what looked like a smear campaign against Mrs. Mitchell and Bill Brownlee.


Fact:  Mrs Neomia Mitchell has not been a Maple Heights voter elected city official since 2011, yet that has not stopped City Hall officials from making Mrs. Mitchell a political punching bag.



Fact:  Mrs. Neomia Mitchell has been active in trying to integrate the fire department with minority fire fighters (there has never been a Black fire fighter in Maple Hts) while City Hall appears to have done nothing of real import to integrate the fire department with minority firefighters.  



Fact:  Mrs. Neomia Mitchell has been active in trying to get more minority police officers in the police department, yet City Hall has no forward looking written plan to do it.  



Fact:  Mrs. Neomia Mitchell wants an Independent Citizen's Review Board  with subpoena power. City Hall officials have not even opened it up for public discourse.

  

Fact: Mrs. Neomia Mitchell has fought along side of the seniors who fought all the way to the Ohio Supreme Court (an won) to let the voters decide if they wanted speed cameras or not.  City hall officials did not want the voters to decide.



Fact:  Whatever you think of Bill Brownlee, he is the one who has made it a point to bring desperately needed  transparency to Maple Height's government by videotaping council meetings and other meetings and putting them on Youtube so you could see what goes on in these meetings.  The law director was caught taking down Mr. Brownlee's camera after Mr. Brownlee was removed from a council meeting.  Mr. Brownlee was the person responsible for the first question and answer public panel meeting to discuss the speed cameras after Mrs. Mitchell and her group took up the fight to let the voter decide about the speed cameras.  



Fact:  Mr. Brownlee and Neomia Mitchell are not responsible for Maple Heights being in fiscal watch.  Read the auditor's report.



Fact: Maple Heights government's full-time work force is full of way too many non residents.



Where does the buck stop?   Say it with us ... CITY HALL!!!!!



Wednesday, September 10, 2014

MAPLE HEIGHTS STRUGGLES WITH RACIAL DIVERSITY AND IS COMPARED TO FERGUSON

Monday, March 18, 2013

MISSING POLICE BLOTTER

Cleveland.com  has a section called "Community News".  On that page you'll see "Read Your Community Police Blotter".  I was curious as to the reason why Maple Heights is not listed. 
 
 
I've mentioned before about Maple Heights government's problems with transparency, as well as accountability.  We need a police blotter either in the Neighborhood News or posted on the internet (if it isn't already).  Nevertheless, we still need an Independent Citizen's Review Board.
 
 
Keep watch 
 

Related:

Police Blotters for Northeast Ohio Suburbs  (from Sun News)

Letter regarding a Colorado civilian review board

Cleveland Crime Watch



PS:
Emailed the following to Mayor Lansky on February 12, 2013 (still waiting for a reply) / This was not a public records request:


Dear Mayor Lansky,
 
 
I am requesting that members of the police department not come to any resident's home after the hours of 8:30 pm on routine business matters (such as signing statements). The resident should be called and given the choice if they would like the member/s of the police department to come to their home, or if resident would like to come to the office regarding that routine business matter (such as signing statements). If the resident chooses for a member/s of the police department to come to their home on a routine business matter (such as signing statements), the resident should be allowed to specify what time or time period and day. The resident should be able to request, if they so choose, a time or time period after 8:30pm.
 
Regarding the above, when member/s of the police department arrive at the resident's home, they should knock or ring the door bell, and ask if they can enter the resident's home.
 
Further, I am requesting that no more than one police car be assigned, and no more than 2 police officers regarding the above. If there is any ambiguity regarding my request, please let me know; and please only reply either by email, or fax or regular mail only within 10 business days.

 
Thank you.
 
 
 
Sincerely,
Elaine Stone